One day at my praxis site, one of the women, Niña Isaura,
was telling us about how they had recently lost a chicken. She described how
she and her two younger daughters had been frantically searching everywhere for
the escaped hen. This family is one of the lucky ones; they have quite a few
chickens. But chickens here in El Salvador are precious for the eggs that they
provide. As Isaura was talking about the search for this chicken, I couldn’t
help but think about the Biblical story of the Good Shepherd. Imagine if Isaura
and her daughters had left behind all of their other chickens and possessions
to search far and wide for a single lost chicken. Crazy! But that’s what God,
the good shepherd, would do for any one of us.
That same day we talked to Niña Juana for three hours after
lunch. The conversation was really wonderful—we were talking about faith, in
particular how we live out our faith. At one point my mind started to wander
and I started to stress out about all of the other things I had to do: figure
out what I’m doing with the summer, finish my reading and homework for the rest
of the day, write applications, do my laundry… etc. But instead I was spending
the day simply talking to people, relaxing in the shade discussing faith and
politics and life. Then the story of Mary and Martha flashed in my mind. Mary
chose to sit at Jesus’ feet and listen to him, while Martha worked in the
kitchen to prepare the meal. When Martha complained, Jesus told her, “Mary has
chosen the better part, and it will not be taken from her.” These people that I
am blessed to accompany and to listen to are Jesus. It’s a blessing to be able
to sit in their presence and to talk and listen and learn from them. Sitting
and listening and absorbing what they have to say is the better part, more so
than any “productive” activity I could have been doing.
I took an Old Testament class during my sophomore year and
it blew my mind. My professor told us that the biggest problem we have when we
read the Bible is that we treat it like a Western book. This becomes a problem
when we realize that the Bible contradicts itself all the time. This idea of
contradictory stories laid side by side is called parataxis, and resulted
because the Bible was compiled from several different sources. The
contradictions that exist lead many people to throw their hands up and declare
that the Bible can’t possibly be true. However, my professor told us that the
compilation of so many different stories about God leads us to a greater, more
whole understanding of who God is.
For example, in Genesis there are two different creation
stories, one after the other. The first creation story emphasizes the creative
power and authority of God. Creation begins when a wind from God sweeps over
the waters. Genesis 1:3 says, “Then God said, ‘Let there be light’; and there
was light.” This format continues throughout the first creation story: Gods
says, and his command becomes reality. God is portrayed as a transcendent being
whose voice commands absolute authority and power. God creates order from
chaos. This is an impressive, though admittedly cold, first impression of the
Old Testament God. However, this picture of God is complicated as the redactors
of the Bible present a second creation story. In this story, God is a more
familiar figure. He speaks candidly, rather than in the formulaic way of the
first creation story. He uses trial and error to find a partner for the man
(Gen. 2:20). He walks through the Garden (Gen. 3:8). He is strikingly different
from the removed, far-off God of the first creation story; yet the writers
place the two stories side by side. This instance of parataxis shows the
Biblical writers’ desire to show that God is transcendent and powerful, but
that he is also a God who desires to have an intimate relationship with his
people.
Here, I think I’m starting to understand this concept better.
My history class is called “Perspectives on the Civil War.” In the class, we
hear from speakers of all different backgrounds, political opinions, and degrees
of involvement in the war. Through their stories, and the stories of all of the
other people we’ve heard from, I’ve started to have a more complete
understanding of the complexity of the war. We read a book in History class
called Monseñor Romero: Memories in
Mosaic. It’s about the last few years of Romero’s life, before and after
his conversion. The most remarkable part of the book, though, is that it’s
entirely made up of the testimonies of people who knew and interacted with
Romero. Through all of their different perspectives, opinions, and stories,
I’ve gotten a better understanding of who Romero was.
I was reading one of Monseñor Romero’s homilies recently,
and it struck me how well he was able to relate the Gospel to the reality of
the Salvadoran people. He read the Gospel through the lives of the campesinos. This
particular homily changed the loaves and the fishes into tortillas and beans,
but there are so many other examples. Maybe this is why it’s sometimes so
difficult to understand the Bible in the US. Jesus came for the poor, and he
invites us all to join in the work for justice for them. In the US, we’ve
become so far removed from this reality that the words no longer speak to
us.
One of the biggest questions I came to El Salvador with was
how to reconcile the traditional Catholic faith that I grew up with and loved
with this new idea of liberation theology and lived religion. Here, the Bible
has become so real to me. Jesus came to the world with a message for the poor
and for those who walked with the poor. “Blessed are the poor in spirit.” In
Salvador, I feel closer to understanding that message than I ever have before.